Buna dimineata! Am o mare problema.La scoala primim lectura sumplimentara, iar luni am sa dau test din ceea ce am citit.Nu am apucat sa citesc "Numele trandafirului"de Umberto Eco.Am cautat si pe internet rezumat dar nu am gasit ceva in termeni "scolari" ca sa-i numesc asa.Rugamintea mea este ca daca a citit cineva cartea sa incerce sa-mi faca un rezumat.Multumesc!

Preia-ti riscul de a lua nota proasta daca nu ai fost in stare sa citesti. Personal, consider un furt chestia asta. Dar ma roag, te priveste. Ti-am spus cum se vede dinafara.
Ai alaturat un text in limba engleza cu care sper sa te descurci. Poti sa folosesti translatorul de la google. Nu am vreme sa iti traduc. Succes.


"Franciscan friar William of Baskerville and his novice Adso of Melk travel to a Benedictine monastery in Northern Italy to attend a theological disputation. As they arrive, the monastery is disturbed by a murder. As the plot unfolds, several other people mysteriously die. The protagonists explore a labyrinthine medieval library, the subversive power of laughter, and come face to face with the Inquisition. It is left primarily to William's enormous powers of logic and deduction to solve the mysteries of the abbey.

On one level, the book is an exposition of the scholastic method which was very popular in the 14th century. William demonstrates the power of deductive reasoning, especially syllogisms. He refuses to accept the diagnosis of simple demonic possession despite demonology being the traditional monastic explanation. Although the abbey is under the apprehension that they are experiencing the last days before the coming of Antichrist (a topic closely examined in the book), William, through his empirical mindset, manages to show that the murders are, in fact, committed by a more corporeal instrument. By keeping an open mind, collecting facts and observations, following pure intuition, and the dialectic method, he makes decisions as to what he should investigate, exactly as a scholastic would do. However, the simple use of reason does not suffice. The various signs and happenings only have meaning in their given contexts, and William must constantly be wary of which context he interprets the mystery. Indeed, the entire story challenges the narrator, William's young apprentice Adso, and the reader to continually recognize the context he is using to interpret, bringing the whole text to various levels which can all have different hermeneutical meanings. The narrative ties in many varied plot lines, all of which consider various interpretations and sources of meanings. Many of the interpretations and sources were highly volatile controversies in the medieval religious setting, all while spiraling towards what seems to be the key to understanding and truly interpreting the case. Although William's final theorems do not exactly match the actual events as written, those theorems do allow him to solve the abbey's mystery."